Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 879985
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T12:01:25+00:00 2026-05-15T12:01:25+00:00

I am working on a latency sensitive part of an application, basically i will

  • 0

I am working on a latency sensitive part of an application, basically i will receive a network event transform the data and then insert all the data into the DB. After profiling i see that basically all my time is spent trying to save the data. here is the code

private void insertAllData(Collection<Data> dataItems)
{
    long start_time = System.currentTimeMillis();
    long save_time = 0;
    long commit_time = 0;
    Transaction tx = null;
    try
    {
        Session s = HibernateSessionFactory.getSession();
        s.setCacheMode(CacheMode.IGNORE);
        s.setFlushMode(FlushMode.NEVER);
        tx = s.beginTransaction();
        for(Data data : dataItems)
        {
            s.saveOrUpdate(data);
        }
        save_time = System.currentTimeMillis();
        tx.commit();
        s.flush();
        s.clear();
    }
    catch(HibernateException ex)
    {
        if(tx != null)
            tx.rollback();
    }
    commit_time = System.currentTimeMillis();
    System.out.println("Save: " + (save_time - start_time));
    System.out.println("Commit: " + (commit_time - save_time));
    System.out.println();
}

The size of the collection is always less than 20. here is the timing data that i see:

Save: 27
Commit: 9

Save: 27
Commit: 9

Save: 26
Commit: 9

Save: 36
Commit: 9

Save: 44
Commit: 0

This is confusing to me. I figure that the save should be quick and all the time should be spent on commit. but clearly I’m wrong. I have also tried removing the transaction (its not really necessary) but i saw worse times… I have set hibernate.jdbc.batch_size=20…

I can expect to get as many as 500 messages/sec so i need single message handling to be under 20 milliseconds.

i need this operation to be as fast as possible, ideally there would only be one roundtrip to the database. How can i do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T12:01:25+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:01 pm

    Move your primary key generation away from a server side auto-increment. Your Java code must be responsible for the PK generation to avoid round trips.

    For decent bulk insert performance, you need a method that won’t need to hit the database on every single call to saveOrUpdate. Using UUIDs as the primary key, or implementing HiLo can help achieve this. Otherwise, there’s no bulk insert actually going on.

    To have both performance and interoperability with other external systems, the pooled or the pooled-lo optimizers are the best choice.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm working on a real-time application with the following characteristics: Hundreds of clients will
I'm working on a GPGPU application that transfers data between the cpu and gpu
I'm working on an application that will run on Google App Engine. I would
I am working on GPU device which has very high division integer latency, several
Working on game where plates will be falling from top to bottom. Some plates
We are working to reduce the latency and increase the performance of a process
Motivation: I'm working on an app that makes several (client) phones read audio data
I am having issues getting the network.request function in Corona SDK working with a
I'm working on an audio application, written in C. I need to provide live
I'm working on a C# Server application for a game engine I'm writing in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.