Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8201483
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T06:49:48+00:00 2026-06-07T06:49:48+00:00

I am working on a multi-threaded C++ program which deals with a lot of

  • 0

I am working on a multi-threaded C++ program which deals with a lot of synchronization issues. I am using Visual Studio 2008.

The run-time behavior of my program (the order in which statements are executed across threads) seems to change when I debug it using breakpoints. Can this be explained? What is the concept at play here? I would expect the order of execution to remain the same.

Second question – if Thread1 is blocked by, say, a wait function call. Thread2 has statements waiting to be executed, in ready state. Is there any situation where the program will wait for Thread1 to proceed rather than giving execution to Thread2? I have removed all dependencies between the two thread and ensured that Thread2 is not waiting for any resource.

Appreciate the responses.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T06:49:50+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 6:49 am

    This article on multithreaded debugging techniques makes a few good summary points on the topic:

    Multithreaded bugs may not surface when running under the debugger. Multithreading bugs are very sensitive to the timing of events in an application. Running the application under the debugger changes the timing, and as a result, may mask problems. When your application fails in a test or worse, the customer environment, but runs reliably under the debugger, it is almost certainly a timing issue in the code.

    …and more to your specific latter question, it’s important to understand that–in the majority case–the operating system is free to interrupt the execution of any of your threads whenever it pleases, even ones that are “ready” to execute.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm actually working with a multi threaded program which involves lots of mysql operations,
I wrote a multi-threaded program which does some CPU heavy computation with a lot
i'm working with a multi-threaded program (using pthreads) that currently create a background thread
I have a multi threaded program in C that was working well but was
I am working on multi-threaded application where I am using SetEvent() to close the
I'm using visual studio to program this small TcpServer. It's really specific. The server
I am working on a multi threaded server application for processing serial/USB ports. The
I'm working on a multi-threaded win32 MFC application. We are rendering a map and
I'm currently working on a multi-threaded application, and I occasionally receive a concurrently modification
I am working with a multi-thread program. First I redirect my stdout to a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.