Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 280691
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:08:24+00:00 2026-05-12T05:08:24+00:00

I am working on a project in which, to resolve a versioning issue, I

  • 0

I am working on a project in which, to resolve a versioning issue, I am creating many classes which will never be tested and must not ever be used – they just need to be there to keep the compiler happy. I’d like to make sure they are never used. This morning I had the idea of throwing an exception in a static initialization block:

public class Dummy {

    static {
        throw new IllegalStateException("Do not use this class!");
    }
}

But the compiler doesn’t like it. Can you think of any way to do this?

EDIT: to be clear (my fault I wasn’t clear before), these won’t just be empty classes. There will be all sorts of code in here, and by “keep the compiler happy” I did indeed mean that elsewhere I will be instantiating them, calling methods etc etc. I want this code elsewhere to compile but fail at runtime. I have accepted Jon’s answer but will also be using @Deprecated and documenting extensively as appropriate.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:08:24+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:08 am

    Just add a dummy condition:

    public class Dummy {    
        static {
            if (true) {
                throw new IllegalStateException("Do not use this class!");
            }
        }
    }
    

    I’m not really sure I like this, but it may do what you want it to. Are you sure there’s no alternatively which would let you get away without having a completely useless class like this?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 315k
  • Answers 315k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The problem is that you are making the ajax request… May 13, 2026 at 11:12 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer NHibernate has issues mapping interfaces to tables. We've gotten around… May 13, 2026 at 11:12 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You write that the GadgetPresenter which creates the GadgetConfigPresenter[.] Instead… May 13, 2026 at 11:12 pm

Related Questions

I am working on a project that is using NetTcp bindings for talking to
I am working on a self project, where I am trying to convert a
I am currently working on a project. In this project I have set of
I am working on an ASP.NET project which is physically located at C:\Projects\MyStuff\WebSite2. When

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.