Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9314621
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 19, 20262026-06-19T02:10:45+00:00 2026-06-19T02:10:45+00:00

I am working on a recursive map class called group_by which models the SQL

  • 0

I am working on a recursive map class called group_by which models the SQL namesake.

For example, gb is a group_by object which will store pointers to foo grouped by std::string, int, and char key types, in that order.

group_by<foo,std::string,int,char>  gb;

group_by provides an at( I const& key ) accessor method which can be used to look inside current level map. Chaining at() calls to retrieve deeper maps works fine.

auto& v = gb.at( k1 ).at( k2 ).at( k3 ).get_vec();

PROBLEM

I would like to create an alternative of at() called at_variadic( Args const& ...args ) which can retrieve deeper maps all in one call, without chaining.

auto& w = gb.at_variadic( k1, k2 );
auto& x = gb.at_variadic( k1, k2, k3 );

However, I am running into some issues. First of all, I don’t know how to specify the return type, since it depends on the variadic arguments. Maybe use decltype(), somehow?

WORKING ANSWER

Ecatmur’s answer below outlined a good approach.

I had to play around with terminal case of group_by<> to make the compiler happy, but the code below, heavily based on Ecatmur’s answer, seems to work fine with gcc 4.7.2.

#include <cassert>
#include <map>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>

template< typename T, typename... Args >
struct group_by
{
    using child_type = T;

    std::vector<T*>  m_vec;

    void insert( T* t ) 
    {
        m_vec.push_back( t );
    }

    child_type&
    at( size_t i )
    {
        return *m_vec[i];
    }
};

template< typename T, typename I, typename... Args >
struct group_by<T,I,Args...>
{  
    using child_type = group_by<T,Args...>;

    std::map<I,child_type>  m_map;

    void insert( T* t ) 
    {
        m_map[ *t ].insert( t );
    }

    child_type& at( I const& key ) 
    {
    return m_map.at( key );
    }

    template<typename... Ks>
    auto
    at( I const& i, Ks const&...ks )
    -> decltype( m_map.at( i ).at( ks... ) )
    {
        return m_map.at( i ).at( ks... );
    }
};

// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

struct foo
{
    std::string  s;
    int          i;
    char         c;

    operator std::string() const { return s; }
    operator int        () const { return i; }
    operator char       () const { return c; }

    bool operator==( foo const& rhs ) const
    {
        return s==rhs.s && i==rhs.i && c==rhs.c;
    }
};

int main( int argc, char* argv[] )
{
    foo f1{ "f1", 1, 'z' };
    foo f2{ "f2", 9, 'y' };
    foo f3{ "f3", 3, 'x' };
    foo f4{ "f1", 4, 'k' };

    group_by<foo,std::string,int,char>  gb;

    gb.insert( &f1 );
    gb.insert( &f2 );
    gb.insert( &f3 );
    gb.insert( &f4 );

    std::string k1{ "f1" };
    int         k2{ 1    };
    char        k3{ 'z'  };

    auto& a = gb.at( k1 ).at( k2 ).at( k3 ).at( 0 );
    auto& b = gb.at( k1 ).at( k2 ).m_map;
    auto& c = gb.at( k1 ).m_map;
    auto& d = gb.at( k1, k2 ).m_map;
    auto& e = gb.at( k1, k2, k3 ).m_vec;
    auto& f = gb.at( k1, k2, k3, 0 );

    assert( a==f1 );
    assert( b.size()==1 );
    assert( c.size()==2 );
    assert( d.size()==1 );
    assert( e.size()==1 );
    assert( f==f1 );

    return 0;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-19T02:10:46+00:00Added an answer on June 19, 2026 at 2:10 am

    Chained method calls are essentially recursive, so you need to implement at recursively:

    child_type& at( I const& key ) {
        return m_map.at( key );
    }
    
    template<typename J, typename... Ks>
    auto at(const I &i, const J &j, const Ks &...ks)
    -> decltype(m_map.at(i).at(j, ks...)) {
        return m_map.at(i).at(j, ks...);
    }
    

    Note that since at requires at least 1 argument, the variadic form takes at least 2 parameters. This is significantly easier to implement than dispatching on sizeof..., and should be easier to read.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been working on a recursive directory scan which scans folders and adds
I am working on a Recursive QuickSort method implementation in a GenericList Class. I
I'm currently working on an app using javascript which has a recursive function. I
I am currently working on a function in which I use a recursive CTE,
I'm working an example to help me learn how to use first-class functions in
I'm working on a library where I want to define a recursive class that
I have a recursive function working on a list, the function contains a loop
I'm asking this because I'm working with a recursive function that generates a large
I am working (in Java) on a recursive image processing algorithm that recursively traverses
I am working with PHP's SPL Recursive Iterators, they are rather confusing to me

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.