Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 407709
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T17:37:16+00:00 2026-05-12T17:37:16+00:00

I am working on a scientific application that has readily separable parts that can

  • 0

I am working on a scientific application that has readily separable parts that can proceed in parallel. So, I’ve written those parts to each run as independent threads, though not for what appears to be the standard reason for separating things into threads (i.e., not blocking some quit command or the like).

A few questions:

Does this actually buy me anything on standard multi-core desktops – i.e., will the threads actually run on the separate cores if I have a current JVM, or do I have to do something else?

I have few objects which are read (though never written) by all the threads. Potential problems with that? Solutions to those problems?

For actual clusters, can you recommend frameworks to distribute the threads to the various nodes so that I don’t have to manage that myself (well, if such exist)? CLARIFICATION: by this, I mean either something that automatically converts threads into task for individual nodes or makes the entire cluster look like a single JVM (i.e., so it could send threads to whatever processors it can access) or whatever. Basically, implement the parallelization in a useful way on a cluster, given that I’ve built it into the algorithm, with the minimal job husbandry on my part.

Bonus: Most of the evaluation consists of set comparisons (e.g., union, intersection, contains) with some mapping from keys to get the pertinent sets. I have some limited experience with FORTRAN, C, and C++ (semester of scientific computing for the first, and HS AP classes 10 years ago for the other two) – what sort of speed/ease of parallelization gains might I find if I tied my Java front-end to an algorithmic back-end in one of those languages, and what sort of headache might my level of experience find implementing those operations in those languages?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T17:37:17+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:37 pm
    • Yes, using independent threads will use multiple cores in a normal JVM, without you having to do any work.

    • If anything is only ever read, it should be fine to be read by multiple threads. If you can make the objects in question immutable (to guarantee they’ll never be changed) that’s even better

    • I’m not sure what sort of clustering you’re considering, but you might want to look at Hadoop. Note that distributed computing distributes tasks rather than threads (normally, anyway).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a local scientific application that uses threads to process independent pieces of
In the application that I'm currently working on, it is possible for multiple users
I'm working on a scientific computing code (written in C++), and in addition to
Working with a SqlCommand in C# I've created a query that contains a IN
Working on a project that parses a log of events, and then updates a
Working with an Oracle 9i database from an ASP.NET 2.0 (VB) application using OLEDB.
Working on a project where a sequential set of methods must be run every
I'm working on a vb.net application which imports from an Excel spreadsheet. If rdr.HasRows
Working with dates in ruby and rails on windows, I'm having problems with pre-epoch
Working on a project at the moment and we have to implement soft deletion

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.