Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8870809
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T17:49:45+00:00 2026-06-14T17:49:45+00:00

I am working on code which implements a Multilevel Feedback Queue Scheduler. There is

  • 0

I am working on code which implements a Multilevel Feedback Queue Scheduler. There is something not clear in a part of the code:

void Scheduler_MFQS :: fill_queue(int clk) {
    list<Process>::iterator itr;
    for(itr = processes.begin(); itr != processes.end(); itr++) {
            if((itr -> has_arrived(clk)) && (!queues[0].contains(*itr))) {
                    Process tmp (*itr);
                    queues[0].add_process(tmp); 
                    remove(processes.begin(), processes.end(), *itr);
             }
    }       
}

What this basically does is just put the process into the base queues under some condition. But i don’t know what Process tmp (*itr); means? However, it compiles legally. Does that mean create a Process object called tmp? But what is the next, iterator (*itr) mean in c++?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T17:49:46+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 5:49 pm
    "Process tmp (*itr);" mean?
    

    It calls Process(const Process& &) copy constructor to create tmp object;

    what is the next, iterator (*itr) mean in c++?
    

    itr is std::list::iterator type, it’s a pointer to current list node. *itr is getting the content of itr, which is a Process.

    Your code can enhance a bit, demo as below:

       // list<Process>::iterator itr; // move this into for loop, narrow variable scope and lifetime
        /*auto if C++11*/
         processes.unique();  // you actually only want unique processes from list
        for(list<Process>::iterator itr = processes.begin(); itr != processes.end(); ++itr) 
                                                             ^^ call preincrement, faster
        {
            if((itr -> has_arrived(clk)) /*&& (!queues[0].contains(*itr))*/) {
                                         ^^ process list contains unique item only, no need to compare
             //Process tmp (*itr); comment out this line, save one object copy
             queues[0].add_process(*itr);              
             //remove(processes.begin(), processes.end(), *itr);   
             // You don't need to clear item in the loop              
            }
        }
    
       processes.clear();   // or swap with an empty list
       // std::list<Process> p2;
       // p2.swap(ps);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've implemented the following code on the site I'm working on which works great,
I am working on a code which requires a function. This function gets a
I am working with some code which outputs a 3x3 rotation matrix and a
I'm working on some code which fills a GridView full of images that have
I have a working JavaScript code below which dynamically creates JSON object using JSON.parse
I have code which as been working against an older Active Directory server and
I have the following code which is working, I was wondering if this can
I have jquery validation code which is working fine in ff but the same
I have this set of code which was working fine about an hour or
I am working on a piece of code which uses regular expressions in c.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.