Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 139299
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:24:36+00:00 2026-05-11T07:24:36+00:00

I am working on optimizing a SQL query that goes against a very wide

  • 0

I am working on optimizing a SQL query that goes against a very wide table in a legacy system. I am not able to narrow the table at this point for various reasons.

My query is running slowly because it does an Index Seek on an Index I’ve created, and then uses a Bookmark Lookup to find the additional columns it needs that do not exist in the Index. The bookmark lookup takes 42% of the query time (according to the query optimizer).

The table has 38 columns, some of which are nvarchars, so I cannot make a covering index that includes all the columns. I have tried to take advantage of index intersection by creating indexes that cover all the columns, however those ‘covering’ indexes are not picked up by the execution plan and are not used.

Also, since 28 of the 38 columns are pulled out via this query, I’d have 28/38 of the columns in the table stored in these covering indexes, so I’m not sure how much this would help.

Do you think a Bookmark Lookup is as good as it is going to get, or what would another option be?

(I should specify that this is SQL Server 2000)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:24:36+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:24 am

    OH,

    the covering index with include should work. Another option might be to create a clustered indexed view containing only the columns you need.

    Regards,
    Lieven

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 200k
  • Answers 200k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer From the GCC internals documentation: `%cdigit' can be used to… May 12, 2026 at 7:55 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you have access to code of application it's quite… May 12, 2026 at 7:55 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Only one. Each application instance within IIS does not affect… May 12, 2026 at 7:55 pm

Related Questions

I am working on optimizing my site, and I have had the MySQL slow
I am working on a 2D scrolling game for iPhone. I have a large
index.php has this jquery code which loads notifications.inc.php into a div on the page
I'm writing some optimized C code that basically runs through an array and does

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.