Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7040365
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T01:54:35+00:00 2026-05-28T01:54:35+00:00

I am working under Ubuntu 11.04 and now engaged in a project whose source

  • 0

I am working under Ubuntu 11.04 and now engaged in a project whose source code uses routines like “sqrtf” or “lgamma”, which are complained by my IDE, claiming that they cannot be found in “math.h”. A senior member told me I need POSIX.1-2001. I used ldd --version to check my glibc’s version and it gave ldd (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.13-0ubuntu13) 2.13. I guessed the embedded version of glibc is simplified so I decided to make it upgraded to the full glibc-2.14. But after some search in aptitude I found that I have to do a manual installation. Getting frustrated all the way, I realize maybe the God is warning me off the wrong path. So…can anyone give some hints for me? Thank you~

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T01:54:35+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 1:54 am

    As the comment pointed out, it was a bug of CDT.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a program which consists of multiple projects in eclipse (working under ubuntu
I am working in ubuntu under c++ code. I am using gsoap in order
I am now working on a data transfer project under Linux. The Project Team
i am new in programming under linux and trying to get working this code:
i used to have a function defined like this (that is working fine under
Working in bash under Linux ubuntu 10 here I have Bash script that reads
i am working in c++ under ubuntu. is there a way for using gsoap
I am working under eclipse plugin right now. Is there any way to lock
I have been unable to get Riak working under Ubuntu 9 due to many
I am working in c++ under ubuntu. I have the following example: [car.h] #ifndef

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.