Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5953023
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T17:45:56+00:00 2026-05-22T17:45:56+00:00

I am working with optimizing a single C object file with regards on the

  • 0

I am working with optimizing a single C object file with regards on the footprint. I’m using the compiler arm-elf-gcc, as the target platform is for a ARM-926EJ processor.

I want to document the current size and then compare after the optimization and I’m wondering, why does arm-elf-size return a size that is smaller then the actual size of the object file?

This is what I get with arm-elf-size

text data bss dec hex filename
15656 29188 0 44844 af2c hyper.o

And the actual size of the hyper.o file is 54 168 bytes.

Which one should i look at?

Best Regards

Mr Gigu

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T17:45:57+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 5:45 pm

    The object file has headers which aren’t part of the segments sizes reported by elf-size.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm student working on optimizing GCC for multi-core processor. I tried going through the
I've been working on optimizing my site and databases, and I have been using
I am working on developing and optimizing a linear model using the lm() function
I've been working on optimizing my project's DB calls and I noticed a significant
I am working on optimizing a query which is used very frequently on our
Working on a small game using an HTML5 canvas, and javascript. And it's working
I’m working on optimizing some of my queries and I have a query that
I am working on optimizing site load speed for a few moderately high traffic
I'm working on optimizing an application . I found that i need to optimize
I am working on optimizing one of the SQL Job. Here I have few

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.