Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 261475
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T22:26:06+00:00 2026-05-11T22:26:06+00:00

I am writing a function in Haskell that deals with numbers beyond the length

  • 0

I am writing a function in Haskell that deals with numbers beyond the length of a 32 bit int. I cannot find the type to do this and I seem to be searching for the wrong terms.

It needs to be able to hold numbers with the length of about 2^40 without any loss of precision

Example:

addTwo :: Int -> Int -> Int
addTwo a b = a + b

main :: IO()
main = do
    putStrLn ( show ( addTwo 700851475143 1 ) )
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T22:26:06+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:26 pm

    For unbounded precision, use the Integer type. For 64 bits of precision, across platforms, use Data.Int.Int64. Both will be easy to find with Hoogle: http://haskell.org/hoogle/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find that I frequently end up writing a function that I always call
As I was writing this function I knew that I wouldn't get tail call
Whats this syntax useful for : function(String... args) Is this same as writing function(String[]
I'm writing a function that fishes out the src from the first image tag
Let's say that I'm writing a function to convert between temperature scales. I want
Say for instance I was writing a function that was designed to accept multiple
I am having some difficulty writing a function that will search through a directory
I'm writing an interactive function that I'd like to have remember the last argument
I am writing a searching function, and have thought up of this query using
Context I'm writing a Haskell module that represents SI prefixes: module Unit.SI.Prefix where Each

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.