Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7800523
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T00:39:57+00:00 2026-06-02T00:39:57+00:00

I am writing a kernel module and i have to compare to destination addresses..

  • 0

I am writing a kernel module and i have to compare to destination addresses..
I have an array of addresses to which i want to add these addresses dynamically. If the address is already in the array i drop it but if it is not i put it at the next available index.

A snipped of my code is as follows:

daddr = &udp_hdr(sock_buff)->dest; /* an example address just for comparison purposes */
saddr = &udp_hdr(sock_buff)->source; /* an example address just for comparison purposes */

int compare( __be32 addr1, __be32 addr2 ) {

  addr1[0] = 0xff & add1 >> 24;
  addr1[1] = 0xff & add1 >> 16;
  addr1[2] = 0xff & add1 >> 8;
  addr1[3] = 0xff & add1;

  addr2[0] = 0xff & add2 >> 24;
  addr2[1] = 0xff & add2 >> 16;
  addr2[2] = 0xff & add2 >> 8;
  addr2[3] = 0xff & add2;

  for(i=0; i<4; i++) {
    if(addr1[i]==addr2[i]) {;
      i++;
      if(i==4) {
        return 0;
        break;
      } else return 1;
    }
  }
} 

Then I’m comparing using the function

int compare( __be32 addr1, __be32 addr2 ) {

  addr1[0] = 0xff & add1 >> 24;
  addr1[1] = 0xff & add1 >> 16;
  addr1[2] = 0xff & add1 >> 8;
  addr1[3] = 0xff & add1;

  addr2[0] = 0xff & add2 >> 24;
  addr2[1] = 0xff & add2 >> 16;
  addr2[2] = 0xff & add2 >> 8;
  addr2[3] = 0xff & add2;

  for(i=0; i<4; i++) {
    if(addr1[i]==addr2[i]) {;
      i++;
      if(i==4) {
        return 0;
        break;
      } else return 1;
    }
  }
}

However, calling with function with say

compare((__be32)daddr, (__be32)saddr)

comparing addresses like 192.168.1.2 and 192.132.1.2 returns true (herein 0) and in some cases it returns false(herein 1). Where am I going wrong or is there a better way of comparing addresses?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T00:39:58+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 12:39 am

    you end up incrementing i i.e i++ twice if addr1[i] == addr2[i] also the else block is a suspect i guess what you need is

    for(i=0; i<4; i++) {
       if(addr1[i]!=addr2[i]) {;
         return 1;
       }
    }
    return 0;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am writing a kernel module in which i have 3 source files and
I am writing a kernel module which forms its own packet at ip level
I'm writing new kernel module and I add implement new IOCTL's. Is there any
I have a buggy kernel module which I am trying to fix. Basically when
I'm writing my first Linux kernel module, which actually is a RAM disk driver
I am writing a module for the Linux kernel, and I want to create
I am writing a kernel module which acts as a memory storage. And I
I am writing a windows kernel mode driver in which I will have to
I'm currently writing a Linux kernel module, and have problems implementing its communication with
I am writing a kernel module which registers a netfilter hook. I am trying

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.