Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6530055
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T09:42:36+00:00 2026-05-25T09:42:36+00:00

I am writing a library that wraps libmemcached. I noticed that there is an

  • 0

I am writing a library that wraps libmemcached.

I noticed that there is an interesting behaviour setting for memcached which says that I can indicate that I do not care about the results of my memcached commands…

It is known as MEMCACHED_BEHAVIOR_NOREPLY. Why would somebody want to use this?

It would be great if someone could point out a few use cases? multi-get / multi-set spring to mind, but I am not clear how this would be useful.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T09:42:36+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 9:42 am

    ASCII protocol noreply was a mistake. Don’t use it.

    Binary protocol noreply can be used to make really awesome optimizations without any loss of correctness.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'd like to find a JPEG-writing library that can be statically linked (so there
I am writing a Win32 DLL library that can be redistributed. I am using
I am working with a legacy C library that can be extended by writing
I'm writing a library that wraps around a REST API. The wrapper I'm creating
I have a library that I'm writing which processes keystroke events using the Win32
I am writing a class library that wraps different objects (mostly device drivers for
I'm writing a JAR library that can be included inside any WAR, sending log
I am writing a C library that reads a file into memory. It skips
I am writing a .NET library that for various reasons cannot be registered in
So I'm writing a Javascript library that takes x,y coordinates and uses them to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.