Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6917351
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T09:43:10+00:00 2026-05-27T09:43:10+00:00

I assumed that each layout’s element id’s such as buttons, textviews, edittexts, etc. were

  • 0

I assumed that each layout’s element id’s such as buttons, textviews, edittexts, etc. were unique and private to that layout. This being said, you set the Activity to use a certain layout, you should only be able to find view id’s based on the id’s set in that specific layout.

However, I am finding now that I can reference whatever view id I want from my Activity regardless of the physical layout I have specified with “setContentView(R.layout.THELAYOUTIWANTTOTARGET)”. Is this behavior normal, I figured only id’s of those elements on the layout I specified above would be available? Looking at R.java, I believe all the id’s I specified on all layouts are made public variables, thus, no id’s can have the same name or unexpected behavior may occur!

The implications for this on my project is that I must now change all id’s in all layouts to be unique. I figured my supplier layout > title textview would have been different from my customer layout > title textview, is this not the case?

Thank you for clarifying!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T09:43:11+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 9:43 am

    Your assumption is correct. IDS are global, and for large projects it’s sometimes a pain, leading to very long ID names. But that can also be used as an advantage, as you can reuse layouts on different activities.

    For example, you can have a layout for a specific part of your activity (a custom buttons bar for example) that you may want to add to several activities. In this case, you can just inflate it into a specific ViewGroup of the first activity, and also in another ViewGroup in another activity. The methods to access specific buttons based on their ids can then be reused in both activities.

    The method findViewById will only work on the activity you call it from. If a button (or any other component) exists on different activities, only the one in your current activity will be returned.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've always assumed that before I can use the Dvorak layout I need to
This is such a basic issue that I can only assume I'm looking at
Assume that we have multiple arrays of integers. You can consider each array as
I assumed that the C# margin property had a meaning like in CSS -
I had assumed that the canonical form for operator+, assuming the existence of an
For some reason I have always assumed that most of the time a variable
When reading from a IO::Socket::INET filehandle it can not be assumed that there will
Connection.close() may throw SqlException , but I have always assumed that it is safe
I assumed it was strictly by the meta 'description' tag. But I noticed that
I initially assumed that since tcp has a sequence number field of 32 bits

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.