Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7800671
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T00:42:46+00:00 2026-06-02T00:42:46+00:00

I believe that all the problems that have iterative logic can be solved using

  • 0

I believe that all the problems that have iterative logic can be solved using iterations, but can we solve any problem using recursion? Can recursion always substitute iteration? Please provide a proof to your answer if you can. Also assume that we have an infinite stack or we run the program on a Turing machine. I don’t care if this proof is a theoretical proof. (that’s why I mentioned the Turing Machine)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T00:42:47+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 12:42 am

    Yes, recursion can always substitute iteration, this has been discussed before. Quoting from the linked post:

    Because you can build a Turing complete language using strictly iterative structures and a Turning complete language using only recursive structures, then the two are therefore equivalent.

    Explaining a bit: we know that any computable problem can be solved by a Turing machine. And it’s possible to construct a programming language A without recursion, that is equivalent to a Turing machine. Similarly, it’s possible to build a programming language B without iteration, equal in computational power to a Turing machine.

    Therefore, if both A and B are Turing-complete we can conclude that for any iterative program there must exist an equivalent recursive program, and vice versa. This is a theoretical result, in the sense that it doesn’t give you any hints on how to derive one recursive program from an arbitrary iterative program, or vice versa.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I don't believe that I am using any 3.0 specific APIs, but somehow whenever
I have a problem, which I believe to be best solved through a functional
Psssst...! Read on, by all means. But I can tell you here that the
I believe that UIView objects can delegate control to views in iOS programming. However,
I can't believe that the following statement seems to be still true So, I
THIRD EDIT: I now believe that this problem is due to a SOAP version
I have been lead to believe that it is possible to pass a class
My problem is that I have to set a variable in a try statement
I have two problems with the below code that I need help fixing: 1)
I believe that I did everything necessary to change my app for ipad (was

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.