Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1037733
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T14:53:12+00:00 2026-05-16T14:53:12+00:00

I came across the following code – what is the data type of col_8888

  • 0

I came across the following code – what is the data type of col_8888 and why does it reference the union _colours? I googled unions, but I can’t find a reference to this kind of declaration – it looks to me as though col_8888 is a “union of unions”?

union _colours {
    uint8  c[3][4];
    uint32 alignment;
};

static const union _colours col_8888 = 
{        
    {    /*   B     G     R     A  in memory     */
        {    0x00, 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF, }, /* red   */
        {    0x00, 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF, }, /* green */
        {    0xFF, 0x00, 0x00, 0xFF, }, /* blue  */
    }   
};

#define COL_8888_RED   *((uint32 *)&col_8888.c[0])
#define COL_8888_GREEN *((uint32 *)&col_8888.c[1])
#define COL_8888_BLUE  *((uint32 *)&col_8888.c[2])
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T14:53:12+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:53 pm

    The type of col_8888 is union _colours, so it isn’t a union of unions: it’s just a union. In C, it is necessary to prefix the union name with union to use it. Alternatively you can use a typedef. Thus the following two declarations are equivalent:

    union _colours {
        uint8  c[3][4];
        uint32 alignment;
    };
    
    static const union _colours col_8888 =
    ...
    
    /* Equivalent to: */
    
    typedef union {
        uint8  c[3][4];
        uint32 alignment;
    } _colours_t;
    
    static const _colours_t col_8888 =
    ...
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I came across following code and don't know what does having from twice mean
I recently came across the following line of code: var type = (typeof x).toLowerCase();
I came across the following piece of code in the book on data structures
I've came across the following code, ok, not exactly but close. The point of
I came across the following code : int i; for(; scanf(%s, &i);) printf(hello); As
I came across the following code that compiles fine (using Visual Studio 2005): SomeObject
I came across the following code in a code base I am working on:
I have came across the following code, and being a C beginner, I came
I just came across the following code: for(Iterator<String> iterator = stuff.iterator(); iterator.hasNext();) { ...
While going through Effective C++ (by Scott Meyers), I came across the following code

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.