Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 862219
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T09:06:22+00:00 2026-05-15T09:06:22+00:00

I came across this code in some existing codebase: double rad = ComputeCurviness(); double

  • 0

I came across this code in some existing codebase:

double rad = ComputeCurviness();
double off = Math.Abs(rad);
if (rad < 0) off = -off;

It seems to be basically just making off equal to rad. The variables are used interchangeably later in the code. Is there any reason to leave this code in?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T09:06:23+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:06 am

    If rad is -0.0, off will be +0.0. You’d have to inspect the code to see whether this would actually make a difference. The two are equivalent when it comes to calculations and comparisons, but -0.0 is negative, which you can detect if you try hard enough.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 531k
  • Answers 531k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think that the designer part is an extension/plugin, although… May 17, 2026 at 12:00 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Could SDL_GetVideoInfo be returning a pointer to a const SDL_VideoInfo… May 17, 2026 at 12:00 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The portable way to do this (ensuring that you get… May 17, 2026 at 12:00 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I recently came across this in some code - basically someone trying to create
I am currently reading some C++ source code, and I came across this: double
While writing some code i came across this issue: #include <iostream> class random {
I was reviewing some code for log4net and I came across this. private static
So I came across some code this morning that looked like this: try {
I was browsing some code and I came across this macro definition #define D(x)
I was reverse engineering some code and came across this... /************************************************************************/ /* */ /*
Whilst reviewing some Qt C++ code I came across this: class Foo { Q_OBJECT
Today i was writing some heavy reflection-using code, and i came across this behavior
I came across this code: void f(const std::string &s); And then a call: f(

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.