Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7682471
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T18:34:35+00:00 2026-05-31T18:34:35+00:00

I came across this code on reddit . I would have thought that type

  • 0

I came across this code on reddit. I would have thought that type conversions would have caused this to be invalid.

int a[3] = { { {1, 2}, {3, 4}, 5, 6 }, {7, 8}, {9}, 10 };

On clang, I get a few warnings about excessive elements and braces in a scalar initializer. But the contents of a is [1, 7, 9].

Is this actually legitimate, and if it is, could someone explain what exactly is going on?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T18:34:36+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 6:34 pm

    The excess elements are just ignored. There are two parts of 6.7.8 Initialization that you care about. First, from paragraph 17:

    Each brace-enclosed initializer list has an associated current object. When no designations are present, subobjects of the current object are initialized in order according to the type of the current object: array elements in increasing subscript order, structure members in declaration order, and the first named member of a union.

    That one explains why you get 1, 7, and 9 – the current object gets set by those braces. Then as to why it doesn’t care about the extras, from paragraph 20:

    … only enough initializers from the list are taken to account for the elements or members of the subaggregate or the first member of the contained union; any remaining initializers are left to initialize the next element or member of the aggregate of which the current subaggregate or contained union is a part.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Today I came across this question: you have a code static int counter =
this morning I came across this code, and I have absolutely no idea what
I have been looking through some MFC code and i came across this expression.
I'm reading Stroustrup's Programming: Principles and Practice and came across this code: int main()
I came across this code: #include<stdio.h> void main() { int x; float t; scanf(%f,&t);
I came across this code http://support.microsoft.com/kb/320348 which made me wonder what would be the
In my parallel programming book, I came across this code that says the slaves
I came across this code snippet 1 int return_printChar1() { // code // oops!
A couple of times I have came across this code where a local variable
I came across this code accidentally: #include<stdio.h> int main() { int i; int array[3];

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.