Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 508871
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T06:57:08+00:00 2026-05-13T06:57:08+00:00

I came across this inline asm. I am not sure how it should look

  • 0

I came across this inline asm. I am not sure how it should look without this syntax… Could someone show it to me?

__asm__ volatile ("lock\n\tincl %0"
        :"=m"(llvm_cbe_tmp__29)
        :"m"(*(llvm_cbe_tmp__29))"cc");
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T06:57:08+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:57 am
    lock
    incl   llvm_cbe_tmp__29
    

    However, because the operand is specified abstractly, the compiler will generate the code needed to reference it, even if that means a load and store. As a result it is possible that more than two instructions or an addressing mode will be added.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I came across this syntax which i have not seen before struct A {
I came across this code today and don't really understand it. Please could someone
I came across this strange bit of CSS tonight... display: inline !ie; Now I've
Came across this error today. Wondering if anyone can tell me what it means:
I came across this article written by Andrei Alexandrescu and Petru Marginean many years
I came across this recently, up until now I have been happily overriding the
I came across this class while reading a C# book and have some questions.
I came across this snippet of code on MSDN: entityBuilder.Metadata = @res://*/AdventureWorksModel.csdl| res://*/AdventureWorksModel.ssdl| res://*/AdventureWorksModel.msl;
Just came across this quote in a book on OOP that I'm reading, A
Just came across this website . Feature 9 is memory management and they claim

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.