Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7497299
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T19:01:26+00:00 2026-05-29T19:01:26+00:00

I can do this on initialization for a struct Foo: Foo foo = {bunch,

  • 0

I can do this on initialization for a struct Foo:

Foo foo =  {bunch, of, things, initialized};

but, I can’t do this:

Foo foo;
foo = {bunch, of, things, initialized};

So, two questions:

  1. Why can’t I do the latter, is the former a special constructor for initialization only?
  2. How can I do something similar to the second example, i.e. declare a bunch of variables for a struct in a single line of code after it’s already been initialized? I’m trying to avoid having to do this for large structs with many variables:

    Foo foo;
    
    foo.a = 1;
    foo.b = 2;
    foo.c = 3;
    //... ad infinitum
    
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T19:01:31+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 7:01 pm

    The first is an aggregate initializer – you can read up on those and tagged initializers at this solution:

    What is tagged structure initialization syntax?

    It is a special initialization syntax, and you can’t do something similar after initialization of your struct. What you can do is provide a member (or non-member) function to take your series of values as parameters which you then assign within the member function – that would allow you to accomplish this after the structure is initialized in a way that is equally concise (after you’ve written the function the first time of course!)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

How can I do this? Tried using a TypeConverter, but the only thing I
Is this particular code prone to the static initialization order fiasco? I.e. can I
Can this be done by setting a property? I'd prefer that approach then to
Can this be done w/ linqtosql? SELECT City, SUM(DATEDIFF(minute,StartDate,Completed)) AS Downtime FROM Incidents GROUP
Can this be done? It seems like this should be possible. In general, I
Can this be done in JavaScript? type == 1 ? function1() : function2();
Can this be simplified to a one liner? Feel free to completely rewrite it
Can this method work? public String sayHello(){ return Hello.jsp?name= + laala; } I am
How can this line in Java be translated to Ruby: String className = java.util.Vector;
How can this code compile? The code below in the operator int CAN access

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.