Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5966905
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T19:51:58+00:00 2026-05-22T19:51:58+00:00

I can initialise a class in a concise manner using something like: public static

  • 0

I can initialise a class in a concise manner using something like:

public static readonly type TYPE_NAME = new type()
        {
            ClientIp = "ClientIp",
            LanguageCode = "LanguageCode",
            SessionToken = "SessionToken",
            SystemKey = "SystemKey"
        };

However is it possible to initialise a collection in a similar way (inherited from List<>)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T19:51:59+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 7:51 pm
    List<string> strList = new List<string>{ "foo", "bar" };
    
    List<Person> people = new List<Person>{
                                    new Person { Name = "Pete", Age = 12},
                                    new Person { Name = "Jim", Age = 15}
                          };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have classes like this one: class SomeObject { public function __construct($param1, $param2) {
I'm wanting to write a method that I can use to initialise a Map.
I am still very new to Ruby (reading through the Pickaxe and spending most
I have an application that performs various tasks that can take up to a
I have a class which I'm serialising to send over a unix socket and
I have a class that contains an array. I want this array to be
I'm just putting together a little 'hello world' type plugin to add a widget
:: EDIT :: This question is a little sprawling, so I'm trimming it down
In Hidden Features of Java the top answer mentions Double Brace Initialization , with
I'm trying to work out a way of passing the web current http context

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.