Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 835805
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T04:52:53+00:00 2026-05-15T04:52:53+00:00

I can store string of few length in char data type. But when it

  • 0

I can store string of few length in char data type.

But when it exceeds its capacity what can be the alternative way to store string.

I am using char data type.

void setString(char* inPoints)
{
if (strcmp(mPoints, inPoints)!= ZERO) {

    if (mPoints) {

        free(mPoints);
    }

    mPoints = (char*)malloc((strlen(inPoints) + 1)  * sizeof(char));

    strcpy(mPoints, inPoints);
}
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T04:52:53+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:52 am

    Using strncpy instead of strcpy is normally safer, but here you alloc eachtime the right amount of memory needed to store inPoint into mPoint, so I cant see what’s the point. The max length of a string you can store in mPoint is limited by the amount of malloc-able memory.

    Add: you can realloc as suggested, and likely you can add a check on the length to avoid realloc-ing if the string is shorter; so mPoint would be able to hold always strings less than the longest string met so far, or equal to:

    
    // somewhere altogether with mPoints
    size_t mPointsCurrenStorage = INITVAL;
    // e.g. INITVAL is 256, and you pre-malloc-ate mPoints to 256 chars
    // ... in the func
    size_t cl = strlen(inPoints);
    if ( cl >= mPointsCurrentStorage ) {
      mPoints = realloc(mPoints, cl+1);
      mPointsCurrentStorage = cl+1;
    }
    strcpy(mPoints, inPoints);

    this way the storage grows only…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.