I come across Terracotta as a distributed JVM that is stable and robust, however as my understanding of Terracotta is shallow, i am not sure if Terracotta is an alternative to JVMs?
It looks promising.
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I come across Terracotta as a distributed JVM that is stable and robust, however as my understanding of Terracotta is shallow, i am not sure if Terracotta is an alternative to JVMs?
It looks promising.
Terracotta is not a JVM, it’s a shared memory backplane. It does not replace the JVM in any way. Terracotta now owns and makes several projects which can leverage this backplane.
They include
Amongst others. Their product BigMemory also helps to overcome some of the JVM Heap issues with very large allocations.