Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 475015
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T00:20:46+00:00 2026-05-13T00:20:46+00:00

I commonly place into variables values that are only used once after assignment. I

  • 0

I commonly place into variables values that are only used once after assignment. I do this to make debugging more convenient later, as I’m able to hover the value on the one line where it’s later used.

For example, this code doesn’t let you hover the value of GetFoo():

return GetFoo();

But this code does:

var foo = GetFoo();
return foo; // your hover-foo is great

This smells very YAGNI-esque, as the functionality of the foo‘s assignment won’t ever be used until someone needs to debug its value, which may never happen. If it weren’t for the merely foreseen debugging session, the first code snippet above keeps the code simpler.

How would you write the code to best compromise between simplicity and ease of debugger use?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T00:20:46+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:20 am

    I don’t know about other debuggers, but the integrated Visual Studio debugger will report what was returned from a function in the “Autos” window; once you step over the return statement, the return value shows up as “[function name] returned” with a value of whatever value was returned.

    gdb supports the same functionality as well; the “finish” command executes the rest of the current function and prints the return value.

    This being a very useful feature, I’d be surprised if most other debuggers didn’t support this capability.

    As for the more general “problem” of “debugger-only variables,” are they really debugger-only? I tend to think that the use of well-named temporary variables can significantly improve code readability as well.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 284k
  • Answers 284k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I usually let Oracle deal with that by using something… May 13, 2026 at 4:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer TemplateBinding doesn't support two-way data binding (i.e. updating the Points… May 13, 2026 at 4:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer To fix this, I created an Entity, Mapping, and Repository… May 13, 2026 at 4:36 pm

Related Questions

What's the best strategy to use when writing JMeters tests against a web application
There are essentially 2 places to define JavaScript functions in Grails, directly in a
I thought I'd post here in the hope that maybe someone with MVVM expertise
Slippy maps are web widgets which allow the user pan around a two dimensional

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.