Question

I couldn’t find an answer to my problem so I post it as a question. I make a small dummy example to explain it:

enum STORAGE_TYPE
{
    CONTIGUOUS,
    NON_CONTIGUOUS
};

template <typename T, STORAGE_TYPE type=CONTIGUOUS>
class Data
{
    public:
        void a() { return 1; }
};

// partial type specialization
template <typename T>
class Data<T, NON_CONTIGUOUS>
{
    public:
        void b() { return 0; }
};

// this method should accept any Data including specializations…
template <typename T, STORAGE_TYPE type>
void func(Data<T, type> &d)
{
    /* How could I determine statically the STORAGE_TYPE? */
    #if .. ?? 
        d.a();
    #else
        d.b();
    #endif      
}


int main()
{
    Data<int> d1;
    Data<int, NON_CONTIGUOUS> d2;

    func(d1);
    func(d2);

    return 0;
}

Please note that
(1) I do not want a specialization of “func”, as that could solve it but I just want to have 1 generic method “func” with internal static “if” conditions to execute the code.
(2) and I would prefer solution with standard C++ (not C++0x or boost).

Answer 1

Use traits technique:

template <typename T, STORAGE_TYPE type>
struct DataTraits {
  static void callFunction(Data<T, type> &d)
  {
    d.a();
  }
};

template <typename T>
struct DataTraits<T,NON_CONTIGUOUS> {
  static void callFunction(Data<T, NON_CONTIGUOUS> &d)
  {
    d.b();
  }
};


// this method should accept any Data including specializations…
template <typename T, STORAGE_TYPE type>
void func(Data<T, type> &d)
{
    /* How could I determine statically the STORAGE_TYPE? */
    DataTraits<T,type>::callFunction(d);
}