Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6380373
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T02:15:35+00:00 2026-05-25T02:15:35+00:00

I currently have a program I have compiled in x86_64, it relies on quite

  • 0

I currently have a program I have compiled in x86_64, it relies on quite a few libraries also compiled in x86_64 (so recompiling them all would be a big project). I am looking to run a i386 dylib, however whenever I load it using dlopen I get an error saying it was not built for my architecture. Is there any way to either convert the i386 lib directly to a x86_64 (I do not have the source code for this) or run it on an x86_64 architecture?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T02:15:36+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 2:15 am

    You cannot load an i386 library in an x86_64 executable.

    There only way to get an x86_64 library out of an i386 one is to recompile it for the right target. If you don’t have the source code, this cannot be done.

    You can recompile all your code for i386 and use the library though.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I currently have a small Java program which I would like to run both
I have a program that currently has to be compiled in 32 bit mode
We have an app that currently installs itself into 'program files\our app', and it
Say I have a command line C program which is currently executing, and I
I have a cd , dvd. book media program. Currently, i am trying to
I'm currently writing a program in which I would like to access the variable
I have a program (jhead) that compiles with very few tweaks for both Windows
I currently have a program that i wrote that is divided up into 3
I am writing a C program that is expected to be compiled with all
I'm currently working on a program for a C course in which I have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.