Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 960369
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T01:10:20+00:00 2026-05-16T01:10:20+00:00

I currently have a project that uses g++ to compile it’s code. I’m in

  • 0

I currently have a project that uses g++ to compile it’s code. I’m in the process of cleaning up the code, and I’d like to ensure that all functions have prototypes, to ensure things like const char * are correctly handled. Unfortunately, g++ complains when I try to specify -Wmissing-prototypes:

g++ -Wmissing-prototypes -Wall -Werror -c foo.cpp
cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wmissing-prototypes" is valid for Ada/C/ObjC but not for C++

Can someone tell me:
1) Why does gcc this isn’t valid? Is this a bug in gcc?
2) Is there a way to turn on this warning?

EDIT:

Here’s a cut and paste example:

cat > foo.cpp <<EOF
void myfunc(int arg1, int arg2)
{
    /* do stuff with arg1, arg2 */
}
EOF
g++ -Wmissing-prototypes -c foo.cpp  # complains about not valid
g++ -c foo.cpp                       # no warnings
# Compile in C mode, warning appears as expected:
g++ -x c -Wmissing-prototypes -c foo.cpp
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T01:10:22+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 1:10 am

    Did you try -Wmissing-declarations? That seems to work for g++ and detect the error case you describe. I’m not sure which version they added it in, but it works for me in 4.3.3.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.