Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 165053
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T11:51:11+00:00 2026-05-11T11:51:11+00:00

I currently have a thread that listens for data from the network and then

  • 0

I currently have a thread that listens for data from the network and then runs rules on it. I then want to pass the data to the GUI. I am worried about having a deadlock in the GUI. I cant figure out were to put the mutexes on the GUI side. I am also using c# and dotnet 3.5.

What I have come up with is 1) Using a timer to create an event and dump the thread. Worried about performance. 2) Use an intermediary event to copy the data to GUI. 3) Dig in and figure out thread safe way of using GUI.

What do you think is best way to proceed?

Edit: Here is the solution I am using. I pass in the changed element and then protect the big object with a mutex. I use helper function to switch threads using InvokeRequired then BeginInvoke with a delegate. Pulled from reading the answers and then following links until reaching Threading in Windows Forms by Jon Skeet.

  delegate void UInt32ParameterDelegate(UInt32 n);    public void UpdateLocation(UInt32 n)   {      if (InvokeRequired)      {         // We're not in the UI thread, so we need to call BeginInvoke         BeginInvoke(new UInt32ParameterDelegate(UpdateLocation), new object[] { n });         return;      }      // Must be on the UI thread if we've got this far       this.engine.location.UpdateBusy.WaitOne();      // do the work in here       this.engine.location.UpdateBusy.ReleaseMutex();    } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T11:51:12+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 11:51 am

    Synchronization is very easy in Windows Forms. You can call Control.Invoke() in the background thread. The thread will stall until the delegate has finished running on the UI thread. No sync required at all.

    If stalling the thread is a problem, use Control.BeginInvoke(). You’ll have to protect the object(s) you pass to the delegate with a lock if the thread might alter them while it continues running. That’s rarely the case in a producer-consumer scenario, the thread can simply create new objects.

    Do make sure that you don’t Invoke() too often. Do it more frequently than about 1000 times per second and the UI thread will stop pumping Windows messages, being bogged down by handling the invoke requests. Since it is human eyes you’re trying to please, invoking more than about 25 times per second is just wasted effort. Pool intermediate results in a collection object.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a separate thread that listens for data. And on receiving some data
Currently I have a background thread that does some periodic heavy data management. Because
I currently have a thread that I created using CreateRemoteThread(). Everything works great. Upon
I have a class that uses 'System.Net.Sockets.Socket' directly for network comunication, and currently I
I have a client that will send a lots of data to server from
I have a blocking queue of objects. I want to write a thread that
I currently have a database that gets updated from a legacy application. I'd like
I have a thread that listens for a TCP connection. When a connection is
I currently have a Python 2.6 piece of code that runs two loops simultaneously.
I currently have an MS Access application that connects to a PostgreSQL database via

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.