Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 60797
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T18:13:06+00:00 2026-05-10T18:13:06+00:00

I currently have an application that gets hit with over 20,000 users daily and

  • 0

I currently have an application that gets hit with over 20,000 users daily and they mostly look at one data table. This data table is filled with about 20 rows but is pulled from a ‘datatable’ in a db with 200,000-600,000 records of information in the table. Edit: These 20 rows are ‘dynamic’ and do change if the user enters in any information via a text box.

I also currently hold user data along with profile data.

I am currently making about 4 call backs each time a datatable is displayed and I am unable to get it down to 1 call.

Question: I was wondering if I could actually fill the application state every 5 seconds with the 200,000-600,000 rows of data and would it actually speed up the system? Edit: do to the dynamic rows that a user or any other user enters in, the content needs to be refreshed often.

Question 2: How much can I actually hold in application cache and still get away with it going faster?

Edit: With over 20,000 users accessing these 200,000 rows, I would need to cache all of them or at least I think for best practices. When the user comes to my site, this is one of the main pages they look at and probably come back to 2-5 times per visit.

Edit: The user does see a unique set of 20 rows that could be different than any other 20 rows the users see. It is a VERY Dynamic site which a couple of different rows can get updated around once a second.

Edit: If stored in session state, then it will only speed up the amount of times a person views the page. Not the over all application because a person could only view the page once and then leave.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T18:13:06+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 6:13 pm

    Technically, I believe what you want to do is possible, but I wouldn’t reccomend it. There are several factors you have to consider before going down this path.

    1. Do you have the hardware to support it? If you don’t have the memory for such a configuration and you have to page swap, then you’ll probably lose most of speed benefit of having it cached in memory. If you are using an out of process state server, then the system has the overhead of dealing with serialization.

    2. How do you plan on searching for something in that many rows? A database server handles alot of searching and sorting for you behind the scenes. There’s some pretty complex algorithms that they use which you’re going to lose if you cache the data on the webserver.

    There is no real hard an fast rule as to when something is faster in the database as to opposed to in memory. It really depends on how the application is setup and how the data is stored.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I currently have a c++ application that gets built on xp and windows vista/7
I currently have a database that gets updated from a legacy application. I'd like
I currently have an application that naturally gets pushed to the background when the
I currently have a single solution that contains both the one application developed so
We currently have an application that depends largely on stored procedures. There is a
I currently have an application that uses a browserfield to access an internet page
Currently I have an application that receives an uploaded file from my web application.
I currently have an MS Access application that connects to a PostgreSQL database via
I currently have a UINavigationController based application that works just fine. I'd like to
We currently have a quite complex business application that contains a huge lot of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.