Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6724207
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T09:39:42+00:00 2026-05-26T09:39:42+00:00

I currently have this schema: CREATE TABLE `users` ( `users_id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,

  • 0

I currently have this schema:

CREATE TABLE `users` (
  `users_id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `users_name` varchar(50),
  `users_lastname` varchar(50),
  `users_dob` date,
  `users_type` int(11) NOT NULL default 0,
  `users_access` int(11) NOT NULL default 0,
  `users_level` int(11) NOT NULL default 0,
  /* etc...*/
  PRIMARY KEY (`users_id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

CREATE TABLE `users_types` (
  `types_id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `types_name` varchar(50),
  PRIMARY KEY (`types_id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

/* etc..*/

Query:

SELECT
    types_name AS user_type, 
    /* all other fields*/
    users.*
    FROM users
    INNER JOIN users_types ON (users.users_type=types_id);
    /* INNER JOIN for all other tables*/
/* Rest of query */

My new solution:

CREATE TABLE `users` (
  `users_id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `users_name` varchar(50),
  `users_lastname` varchar(50),
  `users_dob` date,
  `users_type` ENUM('type1', 'type2', 'type3'),
  `users_access` ENUM('access1', 'access2', 'access3'),
  `users_level` ENUM('level1', 'level2', 'level3'),
  /* etc...*/
  PRIMARY KEY (`users_id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

Query:

SELECT
    *
    FROM users

From what I see is using ENUM is very simple and can be very fast to execute.

  1. Am I right? Would it be faster for the MySQL Engine to process an ENUM type field rather than having LEFT JOINs?
  2. Is using ENUM a good practice?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T09:39:42+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 9:39 am

    Personally, I think the int data type should be used and ENUM-ification of that data should be done in another layer.

    The table definition is a poor place to store your gamut of enum values. It’s hard to get at easily, and giving your application the power to modify table definitions is a security problem (possibly).

    Instead, I would recommend using an INT type and then in your software, creating a model that interacts with the database below to give the appearance of an ENUM.

    With this design choice, switching database software is trivial, you don’t need to grant “ALTER TABLE” privileges to your production app, and extending your enum is easy. Plus, then you are reducing the number of times that the program needs to do the translation from ENUM -> integer — it can be done at compile-time instead of with every database SQL request.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I currently have a table like this: Stuff ---------- StuffId identity int not null
I do not currently have this issue , but you never know, and thought
How would I create a nested list, I currently have this public function getNav($cat,$subcat){
Currently i have this method: static boolean checkDecimalPlaces(double d, int decimalPlaces){ if (d==0) return
This is the master table structure: CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `gf_film` ( `film_id`
I currently have this working but it requires me to have a static method
Currently i have this: $(.splitCol).click(function () { $.cookie('whichColumn', 'split'); $(.threeCol .active).removeClass(active); $(.leftCol .active).removeClass(active); $(.splitCol
Note: I'm using Google Chrome Currently I have this test page http://www.evecakes.com/doodles/canvas_size_issue.htm It should
We currently have code like this: Dim xDoc = XDocument.Load(myXMLFilePath) The only way we
Using dotnet 2.0. I currently have code like this : DataView dv = new

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.