Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4022696
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T10:30:28+00:00 2026-05-20T10:30:28+00:00

I currently work on a web application based on Spring 3.1.0.M1, annotations based, and

  • 0

I currently work on a web application based on Spring 3.1.0.M1, annotations based, and I have a problem with resolving property placeholders in one specific place of my application.

Here is the story.

1) In my web application context (loaded by DispatcherServlet), i have

mvc-config.xml:

<!-- Handles HTTP GET requests for /resources/version/**  -->
<resources mapping="/${app.resources.path}/**" location="/static/" cache-period="31556926"/> 

...

<!-- Web properties -->
<context:property-placeholder location="
    classpath:app.properties
    "/>

2) Inside app.properties, there are 2 properties, among others:

app.properties:

# Properties provided (filtered) by Maven itself
app.version: 0.1-SNAPSHOT
...

# Static resources mapping
app.resources.path: resources/${app.version}

3) I have a JSP custom tag in my JSP 2.1 templates. This tag is responsible for full resource path construction depending on environment settings, app version, spring theme selection etc. Custom tag class extends spring:url implementation class, so it may be considered a usual url tag but with some additional knowledge about proper path.

My problem is that I cannot get ${app.resources.path} correctly resolved in my JSP custom tag implementation. JSP custom tags are managed by servlet container, not Spring, and therefore dont participate in DI. So I cannot just use usual @Value(“${app.resources.path}”) and get it resolved by Spring automatically.

All I have there is the web application context instance, so I have to resolve my property programmatically.

So far I tried:

ResourceTag.java:

// returns null
PropertyResolver resolver = getRequestContext().getWebApplicationContext().getBean(PropertyResolver.class);
resolver.getProperty("app.resources.path");


// returns null, its the same web context instance (as expected)
PropertyResolver resolver2 = WebApplicationContextUtils.getRequiredWebApplicationContext(pageContext.getServletContext()).getBean(PropertyResolver.class);
resolver2.getProperty("app.resources.path");


// throws NPE, resolver3 is null as StringValueResolver is not bound
StringValueResolver resolver3 = getRequestContext().getWebApplicationContext().getBean(StringValueResolver.class);
resolver3.resolveStringValue("app.resources.path");


// null, since context: property-placeholder does not register itself as PropertySource
Environment env = getRequestContext().getWebApplicationContext().getEnvironment();
env.getProperty("app.resources.path");

So now I’m kinda stuck with that. I know that the ability to resolve my placeholder is somewhere in the context, I just don’t know the correct way to do it.
Any help or ideas to check are highly appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T10:30:29+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 10:30 am

    I think rather than focusing on inner working of context place holder, you can simply define a new util:properties like this:

    <util:properties id="appProperties" location="classpath:app.properties" />
    

    and in your code, use it like this:

    Properties props = appContext.getBean("appProperties", Properties.class);
    

    OR like this wherever you can do DI:

    @Value("#{appProperties['app.resources.path']}")
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.