Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 266167
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T22:49:57+00:00 2026-05-11T22:49:57+00:00

I did some testing with floating point calculations to minimize the precision loss. I

  • 0

I did some testing with floating point calculations to minimize the precision loss. I stumbled across a phenomen I want to show here and hopefully get an explanation.

When I write

print 1.0 / (1.0 / 60.0)

the result is

60.0024000960

When I write the same formula and do explicit casting to float

print cast(1.0 as float) / (cast(1.0 as float) / cast(60.0 as float))

the result is

60

Until now I thought that numeric literals with decimal places are automatically treated as float values with the appropriate precision. Casting to real shows the same result as casting to float.

  • Is there some documentation on how SQL Server evaluates numeric literals?
  • Of what datatype are those literals?
  • Do I really have to cast them to float get better precision (which sounds like irony to me :)?
  • Is there an easier way than cluttering my formulas with casts?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T22:49:58+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:49 pm

    SQL Server uses the smallest possible datatype.

    When you run this script

    SELECT SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(1.0, 'BaseType')
    SELECT SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(1.0, 'Precision')
    SELECT SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(1.0, 'Scale')
    SELECT SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(1.0, 'TotalBytes')
    

    you’ll see that SQL Server implicitly used a NUMERIC(2, 1) datatype.
    The division by 60.0 converts the result to NUMERIC(8, 6).
    The final calculation converts the result to NUMERIC(17, 10).


    Edit

    Taken from SQL Server Books Online Data Type Conversion

    In Transact-SQL statements, a constant
    with a decimal point is automatically
    converted into a numeric data value,
    using the minimum precision and scale
    necessary. For example, the constant
    12.345 is converted into a numeric value with a precision of 5 and a
    scale of 3.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Did some searches here & on the 'net and haven't found a good answer
A few years ago, in the Windows environment, I did some testing, by letting
I recently did some performance testing and analysis of an ASP.NET application using out-of-process
I just did some testing for Int PK join Vs Guid PK. Tables structure
We did some testing at the Apple Store, and we found out our geolocation
I did some testing with C++ hypot() and Java Math.hypot . They both seem
Does anyone have any thoughts on this method? I have did some performance testing
Did some googling and couldn't find a clear answer on this. My assumption is
I did some research and found that the only way to vertically center a
I did some all day learning and I figured out how to add rows

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.