Question

I do lots of string concatenation in code and then I display output. I was wondering if there is any difference between following two codes:

string concat

$str = '';
for($x =0; $x <= 10000; $x++):
    $str .= 'I am string '. $x . "\n";
endforeach;

Output buffering

 ob_start();
 for($x =0; $x <= 10000; $x++):
    echo 'I am string ', $x , "\n";
 endforeach;
 $str = ob_get_contents();
 ob_end_flush();

Answer 1

Here’s a benchmark for you:

<?php

$test_1_start = microtime();

$str = '';
for ( $x = 0; $x <= 10000; $x++ ) {
    $str .= 'I am string ' . $x . "\n";
}

$test_1_end = microtime();
unset($str);
echo 'String concatenation: ' . ( $test_1_end - $test_1_start ) . ' seconds';

$test_2_start = microtime();

ob_start();
for ( $x = 0; $x <= 10000; $x++ ) {
    echo 'I am string ', $x, "\n";
}
$str = ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();

$test_2_end = microtime();

echo "\nOutput buffering: " . ( $test_2_end - $test_2_start ) . ' seconds';

?>

My results:

$ php -v
PHP 5.3.4 (cli) (built: Dec 15 2010 12:15:07) 
Copyright (c) 1997-2010 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2010 Zend Technologies
$ php test.php
String concatenation: 0.003932 seconds
Output buffering: 0.002841 seconds%
$ php test.php
String concatenation: 0.004179 seconds
Output buffering: 0.002796 seconds%
$ php test.php
String concatenation: 0.006768 seconds
Output buffering: 0.002849 seconds%
$ php test.php
String concatenation: 0.004925 seconds
Output buffering: 0.002764 seconds%
$ php test.php
String concatenation: 0.004066 seconds
Output buffering: 0.002792 seconds%
$ php test.php
String concatenation: 0.004049 seconds
Output buffering: 0.002837 seconds%

Looks like output buffering + echo is consistently faster, at least in the CLI / on my machine.

Brendan Long made a good point in his comment, however — there is such a minor performance difference here that a choice of one or the other is not much of an issue.