Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6737989
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T11:18:51+00:00 2026-05-26T11:18:51+00:00

I do not see how to handle the error of a ANTLR grammar: ****************error

  • 0

I do not see how to handle the error of a ANTLR grammar:

****************error message*********
Decision can match input such as "{'+', '-'} IDENT" using multiple alternatives: 1, 2
As a result, alternative(s) 2 were disabled for that input
 |---> add: mult (('+'|'-') mult)*;
***************************************

This is mostly copied from the example of Scott, but I do not see why his works well but mine got stuck and how to get out of it?

—————following Sample.g—————-

grammar Sample;

options { 
  language = Java;
}


 program
      :  'program' IDENT '='
          (constant| variable)*
          'begin'
          (statement)*
          'end' IDENT '.'
      ; 

constant:
       'constant' IDENT ':' type ':=' expression ';' 
      ;

type: 'integer';

variable: 'var' IDENT (',' IDENT)* ':' type  ';';


statement: 'var' IDENT ':=' INTEGER ';' ;

//expression

term: IDENT |'(' expression ')'|INTEGER;
negation: 'not'* term;
unary: ('+'|'-')* negation;
mult: unary (('*'|'/'|'mod') unary)*;

[XXX Errorfor the following line]

add: mult (('+'|'-') mult)*;
relation: add (('='|'/='|'<'|'<=') add)*;
expression: (relation ('and'|'or') relation)*;


END : 'end';

CONSTANT : 'constant';

INTEGER: '0'| (('1'..'9') ('0'..'9')*);   

IDENT: ('a'..'z'|'A'..'Z')('a'..'z'|'A'..'Z'|'0'..'9')*;

WS: ('\n'|' '|'\t'|'r'|'\f')+ {$channel=HIDDEN;};
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T11:18:52+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:18 am

    You’ve misplaced a parenthesis in:

    expression: (relation ('and'|'or') relation)*;
    

    making your grammar ambiguous: the parser cannot decide when it sees a - IDENT if it should be a part of an add– or unary-rule.

    For example, your rule expression now matches this:

    relation ('and'|'or') relation relation ('and'|'or') relation
    

    i.e., two relation rules directly placed after each other. If the parser now stumbles upon input like this:

    - A - B
    

    the parser “sees” two possibilities to parse this input:

    1 (unary expression & unary expression)

    enter image description here

    2 (unary & add expression)

    enter image description here

    It should be:

    expression: relation (('and'|'or') relation)*;
    

    instead, so the there can never be 2 successive expressions (and no ambiguity!).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am using the jQuery DataTable plug-in and can not see to find a
Summary: In a WCF REST service how can I handle incorrect input parameters using
I've looked at similar problems but I simply can not see what is going
This should be pretty simple, still I can not see what/how something could be
Not everyone knows that php can handle variables that have first characters as numbers,
I do not see how this recursive function works: function f(n) { g(n-1) }
Why do I not see the spinner image when I run this code? However
Why one project (exe) does not see the namespace of another project (dll) in
I see a way to configure the DefaultHost with BusConfiguration(), but do not see
The problem is that the Eclipse compiler do not see any layout or ids,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.