Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 881693
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T12:18:14+00:00 2026-05-15T12:18:14+00:00

I do not understand the behavior of the present() intrinsic function with pgf90 7.2.

  • 0

I do not understand the behavior of the present() intrinsic function with pgf90 7.2. I wrote a 20 line sample program to test this, but the results still make no sense to me. Observe:


subroutine testopt(one,two,three,four,five)

  implicit none

  integer, intent(in) :: one,two
  integer, intent(out) :: three
  integer, intent(in), optional :: four
  integer, intent(out), optional :: five

  three = one + two

  print *,"present check: ",present(four),present(five)

  if (present(four) .and. present(five)) then

  five = four*four

end if

end subroutine testopt

if I: call testopt(1,2,(any variable)) from my main program, it prints: “present check: T F”. However if I: call testopt(1,2,(any variable)) from a subprogram it prints: “present check: T T”. I expected to see “present check: F F” in either case, because I am only calling the subroutine with the 3 non-optional arguments, and neither of the optional ones. I cannot fathom why it would behave this way, and this is causing a major bug in a program I am working on. I appreciate any insight. Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T12:18:14+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:18 pm

    Are you placing this subroutine in a module and then having a “use” statement for that module in the calling routine (main program or subroutine)? A typical rule is that many of the advanced / new features of Fortran 90 require an explicit interface so that both the caller and callee pass the arguments consistently. The easiest and best way to accomplish this is with module / use. Just a guess…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I do not understand this error, do not generate error in JsonResult Test (),
I do not understand the behavior of this numpy.ma.max (min, mean, etc.) import numpy
I have this weird behavior in C which I do not understand. It is
I do not understand this behavior: var a = 1; console.log('a is undefined1:', a
I do not understand why this error occurs...Is this a bug in XE, or
I simply do not understand why both works: this.timer.Tick += new EventHandler(timer_Tick); this.timer.Tick +=
I do not understand what is wrong with this query? Query tool does not
I see some strange behavior which I do not understand. I have a helper
I try to understand Firefox's behavior regarding the added prevent this page from creating
I am running into some Rails 2.3.5 ActiveRecord behavior I do not understand. It

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.