Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3227660
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T16:36:03+00:00 2026-05-17T16:36:03+00:00

I do this out of habit: function process( fn ){ // Some process that

  • 0

I do this out of habit:

function process( fn ){
  // Some process that builds data     
  return fn( data );
}

It is not always necessary to return the callback, and I would like to know if there is any performance hit in doing that over simply calling the callback:

function process( fn ){
  // Some process that builds data
  fn( data );
}

And if so, or indeed if not, then why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T16:36:04+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 4:36 pm

    There is no significant performance difference between the two.

    Why: Adding the return value to the stack for use by the caller is a trivial op.

    As they say, it’s de minimis

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I could probably find this out from somewhere else but thought it would be
when programming in Java I practically always, just out of habit, write something like
I cannot figure this out. The workflow of passing IEnumerable<T> (T is some my
I'm having difficulty trying to figure this out. I'm not even sure if it's
Just found this out, so i am answering my own question :) Use a
I am asking this out of a curiosity. Basically my question is when you
I can't figure this out. Capistrano keeps giving me this error: ** [out ::
I can't quite figure this out. Microsoft Access 2000, on the report total section
I can't seem to figure this out. I'm experimenting with MVC Beta and am
I'm trying to work this out. In my project, i have a file called

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.