Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7981143
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T10:17:03+00:00 2026-06-04T10:17:03+00:00

I do understand that both += and var1=var1+var2 both do the same thing in

  • 0

I do understand that both += and var1=var1+var2 both do the same thing in Java. My question is, apart from better readability, what other benefit(if any) the former brings? Im asking because I was curious why java developers introduced this, they should have done it because of some value addition.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T10:17:05+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 10:17 am

    x+=y and x=x+y are not same.

    x+=y is equivalent to x=(Type of x)(x+y)

    byte x=4;
    byte y=3;
    x+=y; // x =(byte)(x+y)
    x = x + y; // compile time error
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I understand that Deque is double ended queue which supports operations from both ends
I understand that AppFabric has both caching capabilities along with hosting WCF/WF services. I
I'll prefix by saying that I understand that both Code Analysis and StyleCop are
I understand that the NUnit vs. MSTest question has been asked alot on SO.
I have two methods in a java class that both have a block of
I understand that both JW player and Flow player are OS, but they both
I understand that both of these will insert html into an element. What are
I understand that they are both supposed to be small, but what are the
I understand that Web Site Projects compile source on-the-fly, and Web Application Projects pre-compile
I understand that CoCreateInstance finds the COM server for the given class id, creates

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.