Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8428321
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T05:01:15+00:00 2026-06-10T05:01:15+00:00

I don’t know how to implement this piece of Python code in Clojure for

  • 0

I don’t know how to implement this piece of Python code in Clojure

for i in range(3):
    try:
        ......
    except e:
        if i == 2:
            raise e
        else:
            continue
    else:
        break

I wonder why something so simple in Python is so hard in Clojure. I think the difficulty is because Clojure is a functional programming language and thus is not suitable for such an imperative task. This is my attempt:

(first
  (remove #(instance? Exception %)
    (for [i (range 3)]
      (try (......)
              (catch Exception e
                (if (== i 2) 
                  (throw e)
                  e)))))))

It is very ugly, and worse, it doesn’t work as expected. The for loop is actually evaluated fully instead of lazily (I realized this when I put a println inside).

If anyone has a better idea to implement that, please enlighten me.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T05:01:16+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 5:01 am

    Similar to Marcyk’s answer, but no macro trickery:

    (defn retry
      [retries f & args]
      (let [res (try {:value (apply f args)}
                     (catch Exception e
                       (if (zero? retries)
                         (throw e)
                         {:exception e})))]
        (if (:exception res)
          (recur (dec retries) f args)
          (:value res))))
    

    Slightly complicated because you can’t recur inside a catch clause. Note that this takes a function:

    (retry 3 (fn [] 
              (println "foo") 
              (if (zero? (rand-int 2))
                  (throw (Exception. "foo"))
                  2)))
    =>
    foo ;; one or two or three of these
    foo
    2
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I don't know why, but this code worked for me a month ago... maybe
Don't know if this is possible, but I have some code like this: val
don't know better title for this, but here's my code. I have class user
Don't know how to frase this but I found this code wich works as
(Don't know if this is strictly on-topic, but I don't see any better Stack
Don't know if this has been asked before, so point me to another question
Don't know if anyone can help me with this or if it's even possible.
I don't know: if this works. if it's a good idea. what it is
I don't know if this question is trivial or not. But after a couple
Don't know why this doesn't work. I can't do implicit animation for a newly

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.