Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1015153
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T10:21:31+00:00 2026-05-16T10:21:31+00:00

I don’t know how to phrase the question properly so sorry in advance. Using

  • 0

I don’t know how to phrase the question properly so sorry in advance.

Using FluentNHibernate in particular, how would you go about making your entities for some tables that have are being referenced by a LOT of other tables?

For example an Employee entity. Employees are generally used almost everywhere and it would make sense for some programs to have their Employees contain multiple Roles, multiple Tasks, or multiple benefits. Right now I’m picturing it to be like this:

public class Employee
{
    public virtual Employee()
    {
        Tasks = new List<Task>();
        Roles = new List<Role>();
        Benefits = new List<Benefit>();
    }

    public virtual Id { get; set; }
    public virtual Name { get; set; }

    public virtual IList<Task> Tasks { get; protected set; }
    public virtual IList<Role> Roles { get; protected set; }
    public virtual IList<Benefit> Benefits { get; protected set; }

    public virtual void AddTask(Task task)
    {
        task.Employee = this;
        Tasks.Add(task);
    }
    public virtual void AddBenefit(Benefit benefit)
    {
        benefit.Employee = this;
        Benefits.Add(benefit);
    }
    public virtual void AddBenefit(Benefit benefit)
    {
        benefit.Employee = this;
        Benefits.Add(benefit);
    }
}

public class EmployeeMapper : ClassMap<Employee>
{
    public EmployeeMapper()
    {
        id( x => x.Id );
        Map( x => x.Name );
        HasMany( x => x.Tasks );
        HasMany( x => x.Roles );
        HasMany( x => x.Benefits );
    }
}

Now whiel in this example there’s just 3 collections, there’s the possibility that it’ll grow and grow with every association made to employee. Like in a Human Resources System, it’ll be associated with everything from Payroll, Addresses, Taxes, Deductions, etc. Wouldn’t it get too overblown if I make a collection for every small reference I call?

Is there a pattern to avoid this scenario of coming or is NHibernate designed so that I have to reference every single object that has a foreign key constraint on my objects?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T10:21:32+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 10:21 am

    The employee does not have to know about every fk reference to itself. Only do that for the ones you actually need to reference through the employee.

    in a relationship where both sides are
    mapped, NHibernate needs you to set
    both sides before it will save
    correctly.

    That simply means that IF you map both sides, then you need to explicitly set the properties on both sides like

    parent.children.Add(child); 
    child.parent = parent;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is beyond both making sense and my control. That being said here is
I am using a 3rd-party rotator object, which is providing a smooth, random rotation
After having read Ian Boyd 's constructor series questions ( 1 , 2 ,
I have a new web app that is packaged as a WAR as part
I have found this example on StackOverflow: var people = new List<Person> { new

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.