Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 829921
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T03:57:32+00:00 2026-05-15T03:57:32+00:00

I don’t know if it’s simply because page-loads take a little time, or the

  • 0

I don’t know if it’s simply because page-loads take a little time, or the way servlets have an abstraction framework above the ‘bare metal’ of HTTP, or just because of the “Enterprise” in Jave-EE, but in my head I have the notion that a servlet-based app is inherently adding overhead compared to a Java app which simply deals with sockets directly.

Forget web-pages, imagine instead a Java server app where you send it a question over an HTTP request and it looks up an answer from memory and returns the answer in the response. You can easily write a Java socket-based app which does this, you can also do a servlet approach and get away from the “bare metal” of sockets.

Is there any measurable performance impact to be expected implementing the same approach using Servlets rather than a custom socket-based HTTP listening app?

And yes, I am hazy on the exact data sent in HTTP requests and I know it’s a vague question. It’s really about whether servlet implementations have lots of layers of indirection or anything else that would add up to a significant overhead per call, where by significant I mean maybe an additional 0.1s or more.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T03:57:34+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:57 am

    Of course there is some overhead. What it’s hard to define is how much, not because it’s hard to measure, but because it’s hard to find an alternative which doesn’t introduce the risk of being more fragile, bug ridden and poorly scalable.

    In other words, supposing you are really dying for performance… will you roll out you own server? How will it deal with managing concurrent requests (all hitting the same port)? Will you write your own parser for the HTTP request? Will it be able to work correctly with all browsers? How will you recognize a session from a given client?

    In other words your question is a bit like asking “do relational DBs introduce a significant overhead when measured against an imaginary custom datastore which nobody has written yet but that would cut out all the unecessary features in favour of raw speed?”

    My answer: yes, of course. I would still use a DB, because it works now, and has been tuned for lots of things developers take for granted, but are horribly inefficient to reinvent every time you discover you need them for your application.


    I strongly suggest, in case you haven’t already, to have a look at Jetty, and specifically at the WebSockets implementation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Don't know how to google for such, but is there a way to query
Don't know whats exactly going on, but it's definitely killing my time for nothing.
I don't know how better to describe this. So take this example. var a
Don't know if this is possible, but I have some code like this: val
Don't know if this has been answered before. Have custom routes to users. If
Don't know why but I can't find a solution to this. I have 3
Don't know the term for the red validation border, does it have one? I
Don't know if there is a better way to do this, so that is
don't know better title for this, but here's my code. I have class user
Don't know if it's stupid or reasonable question. I have methods which returns float/int

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.