Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8689727
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T23:43:42+00:00 2026-06-12T23:43:42+00:00

I don’t know why this method is throwing an ArrayIndexOutOfBounds exception. When I change

  • 0

I don’t know why this method is throwing an ArrayIndexOutOfBounds exception.

When I change the initial "high" value to "int high = array.length - 1;", the program will return any integer value that I search for.

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks in advance!


public class BinarySearch {

public static void main(String[] args) {

    int searchValue = 12;
    int[] givenNums = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 };
    binarySearch(givenNums, searchValue);
    System.out.println("\nResult: " + searchValue);

}

public static int binarySearch(int[] array, int key) {
    int low = 0;
    int high = array.length;
    int mid = (low + high) / 2;
    int i = 0;
    System.out.println();

    while (low <= high) {
        System.out.print(i + " ");
        if (array[mid] < key) {
            low = mid + 1;
            mid = (low + high) / 2;
        } else if (array[mid] > key) {
            high = mid - 1;
            mid = (low + high) / 2;
        }
        else
            return mid;

        i++;
    }
    return -1;
}
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T23:43:44+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 11:43 pm

    You need to be consistent about whether high means the maximum value it can be inclusively or exclusively. You start off with it being an exclusive upper bound:

    int high = array.length;
    

    But then your while loop condition is only appropriate if it’s an inclusive upper bound:

    while (low <= high)
    

    You should probably just change the while condition to:

    while (low < high)
    

    … and change the assignment of high later, too.

    Alternatively, you could keep it inclusive, and change the initial value to array.length - 1.

    That will stop the situation where low == high == mid == array.length, which is where it would blow up.

    I’d also suggest moving the mid = (low + high) / 2 computation to be the first statement within the while loop – then you can get rid of the duplicate code.

    while (low < high) {        
        mid = (low + high) / 2;
        System.out.print(i + " ");
        if (array[mid] < key) {
            low = mid + 1;
        } else if (array[mid] > key) {
            high = mid;
        }
        else {
            return mid;
        }
        i++;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Don't know why this conversion fails. SELECT CAST('32.999' AS INT) throws the error saying
I don't know why, but this code worked for me a month ago... maybe
Don't know if anyone can help me with this or if it's even possible.
I don't know: if this works. if it's a good idea. what it is
Don't know why this doesn't work. I can't do implicit animation for a newly
Don't know what's wrong here, when I run the application it says Specified method
Don't know if this is the right place to ask this, but I will
Don't know why this is happening, but after submitting a form via JS (using
(Don't know if this is strictly on-topic, but I don't see any better Stack
Don't know if this has been asked before, so point me to another question

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.