Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1092967
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T23:45:40+00:00 2026-05-16T23:45:40+00:00

I don’t understand why struct e{ void * a; void * b[]; } has

  • 0

I don’t understand why

struct e{
    void * a;
    void * b[];
}

has sizeof(e) == 4 while

struct f{
    void * a;
    void * b;
}

has sizeof(f) == 8.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T23:45:41+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 11:45 pm

    The second in the first struct is not a pointer, but a FAM – flexible array member. It is used when you have a long buffer and place an e at the start of that buffer. You can then index the remaining memory that follow the e object using that FAM and treat that memory as an array of void*.

    The Standard says (emphasis by me)

    As a special case, the last element of a structure with more than one named member may
    have an incomplete array type; this is called a flexible array member. In most situations,
    the flexible array member is ignored. In particular, the size of the structure is as if the
    flexible array member were omitted except that it may have more trailing padding than
    the omission would imply.

    For example, the following code outputs 1 for the struct without, but 4 for the struct with the FAM on GCC, because to access integers the FAM need to be properly aligned (on a 4 byte boundary in this example)

    struct A {
      char a;
    };
    
    struct B {
      char a;
      int flex[];
    };
    
    int main() {
      printf("sizeof A: %d\nsizeof B: %d\n", 
             (int)sizeof(struct A),
             (int)sizeof(struct B)
        );
    
      struct B *b = malloc(sizeof *b + sizeof(int[3]));
      b->a = 'X';
      b->flex[0] = 1;
      b->flex[1] = 2;
      b->flex[2] = 3;
      free(b);
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Don't understand, if Data.Map is and [] is. I found this out while wondering
Don't understand why #include <Header.h> is not compiling while #include Header.h is compiling with
Don't know if this has been asked before, so point me to another question
Don't think that I'm mad, I understand how php works! That being said. I
Don't know if this has been answered before. Have custom routes to users. If
don't understand: in my controller: @json = User.all.to_gmaps4rails do |user| \Title\: \#{user.email}\ end in
I don't know if this has been asked before, but what i'd like to
Don't quite understand determinism in the context of concurrency and parallelism in Haskell. Some
Don't quite understand why this copy constructor is not invoked when I build with
Don't ask questions, but basically my game has a lot of mouse cursors chasing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.