Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8097299
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T21:42:47+00:00 2026-06-05T21:42:47+00:00

I extend a class with multiple constructors. I add a final field in my

  • 0

I extend a class with multiple constructors. I add a final field in my subclass which ofcourse needs to be initialized in my own constructors.

The problem is I don’t want to re-implement (most) of the constructors of the superclass, so I would like to do something like this:

public myConstructor(Object... params){
    super(params);
    try{
        this.finalField = "backup value";
    }
    catch(someException e){

    }
}

Is this possible in some way or the other?

edit:
I realized this scenario will never happen, because the superclass constructor will never call my own constructor.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T21:42:49+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 9:42 pm

    Have all your constructors call one single constructor that sets the final field.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In java if I extend a class and don't use a super field while
Hi I need to extend the CListControl class in C++/MFC, which will add several
I need to extend a class, which is encapsulated in a closure. This base
A class can be a subclass of itself if its inner class extend the
Suppose I have a Java class with multiple constructors: class Base { Base(int arg1)
I have multiple inheritance like this one: Can I extend a class using more
I am trying to extend a class to multiple other classes e.g. public class
Is it possible to have multiple classes that inherit/extends same class in Google AppEngine
Can a class extend two or more classes in Objective-C?
What is the difference when a class extend from Handler and Thread? As described

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.