Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4030932
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T11:32:03+00:00 2026-05-20T11:32:03+00:00

I feel like there is a better way to do this than how I

  • 0

I feel like there is a better way to do this than how I am doing it now.

I am using Silverlight 4, RIA and EF (with an Oracle adapter). I am inserting a record into a table and doing a lot of validation on it with Validation attributes, but I have one piece of validation that requires querying the DB to check existing records before the new one can be inserted (this seems like it should be common and easy requirement, no?)

Right now, I am doing this client-side with an Invoke method on the DomainService. This seems lame and dumb. But I can’t figure out how to do this server-side where it really belongs.

It seems like there should be a way to handle all of this server-side and inform the client of a validation error, but I can’t quite figure it out and hardly anyone seems to approach this one particular validation scenario.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T11:32:04+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 11:32 am

    WCF RIA provides a means to attach validation to entities on the serverside. You build a class as detailed below naming it Rules.

    public static partial class FooRules
    {
      public static ValidationResult FooIDUnique(Foo foo, ValidationContext context)
      {
        bool check = false;
    
        using (FooEntities fe = new FooEntities())
        { 
          check = fe.Foo.Any(f => f.FooId == foo.fooId); 
        }
        if (!check)
          return ValidationResult.Success;
    
        return new ValidationResult("FooID error msg,", new string[] { "FooID" });
      }
    }
    

    I’ve put together an example app that shows adding validation client and server side with RIA.

    You can download it here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

OK, this is working but I feel there is a better way to do
I feel like there's a simple solution to this, but I'm not really sure
Or a better way than this? String concat(String[] strings) { StringBuilder out = new
Is there a better way of getting this result? This function fails if num
I just had the jQuery epiphany the other day and still feel like there
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here. Usually there's always a million library
I feel there is probably a well trodden design pattern to handle situations like
I feel like I should know this, but I haven't been able to figure
I feel like this is a stupid question because it seems like common sense
This is more a question of semantics than anything else. I'd like to check

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.