Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8240771
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T20:36:20+00:00 2026-06-07T20:36:20+00:00

I feel like this search query is not working as I imagined it would.

  • 0

I feel like this search query is not working as I imagined it would. I want to be certain that the only items selected are those with ksisoldby identical (though case-insensitive, thus ILIKE) to $user. And the the other fields specified with the ANDs and ORs are possible ways this selection could be narrowed down.

"SELECT 
id,
status,
customer_id,
shipping_address_id,
order_number,
reference,
ship_via_id,
order_date :: date,
due_date :: date,
created,
sales_tax,
freight,
taxable,
nontaxable,
job_name,
order_description,
ship_to_name,
ship_to_address1,
ship_to_address2,
ship_to_city,
ship_to_state,
ship_to_zipcode,
name,
address1,
address2,
city,
state,
zipcode,
act_ship_date,
ksisoldby
FROM sales_orders 
WHERE ksisoldby ILIKE '".$user."'
AND (order_description ilike 
'%".implode("%' AND order_description like '%", $search)."%')
OR (order_number ilike 
'%".implode("%' AND order_number like '%", $search)."%')
OR (name ilike 
'%".implode("%' AND name like '%", $search)."%')
OR (reference ilike 
'%".implode("%' AND name like '%", $search)."%')
ORDER BY order_number DESC";

Have I done this correctly, and it is my data that is not set up correctly, or are these AND and/or OR statements overriding the WHERE clause? Thanks for the help.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T20:36:22+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 8:36 pm

    The keyword here is operator precedence. AND binds before OR.

    WHERE ksisoldby ILIKE '".$user."'
    AND (
         order_description ilike '%".implode("%'
         AND order_description like '%", $search)."%')
      OR order_number ilike '%".implode("%'
         AND order_number like '%", $search)."%'
      OR name ilike '%".implode("%'
         AND name like '%", $search)."%'
      OR reference ilike '%".implode("%'
         AND name like '%", $search)."%'
        )
    

    All items in the WHERE clause are evaluated to one boolean result. If you

    want to be certain that the only items selected are those with ksisoldby identical […] to $user

    then you have to wrap the OR‘ed criteria into parenthesis or they will offer alternative ways to qualify.

    On the other hand, you can remove the parenthesis around the AND‘ed pairs like I demonstrate.

    I added (syntactically irrelevant) white space and line breaks to make it clearer.


    BTW – as this came up in the comments – if you don’t want all columns from the table, listing the ones you want (like you have it) is the optimal way.


    I would also consider to use prepared statements (or server-side functions with parameters) instead of building one big query strings to prevent SQL injection. Your framework probably offers some way to do this. Or you can do it manually.

    While you keep building query strings, use quote_literal() to sanitize user input.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

somehow couldn't find this with a google search, but I feel like it has
I feel like this is something I should already know, but I'm just not
I feel like this might be really simple but I'm just not getting it
I feel like this is not a very efficient way of using linq. I
Currently I do like this: IndexSearcher searcher = new IndexSearcher(lucenePath); Hits hits = searcher.Search(query);
I feel like I've seen this question asked before, but neither the SO search
I feel like this is easy but I am missing something... Using jQuery, I
I feel like this should be a no brainer, but clearly I'm missing something...
I feel like this is a stupid question, but I can't think of a
I feel like this should be obvious to me, but for some reason I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.