Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6132799
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T17:08:51+00:00 2026-05-23T17:08:51+00:00

I find it a bit non-intuitive that the (0,0) maps to the left-top of

  • 0

I find it a bit non-intuitive that the (0,0) maps to the left-top of the screen. Is there a historic reason for using a left-handed coordinate system in Java Swing?

While mapping this to a right-handed system is not too difficult, I’m curious to know if there is any hidden benefit in having a left-handed system.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T17:08:51+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 5:08 pm

    According to this article that’s simply because that’s the way it always was with television sets (which hasn’t changed, BTW). So it seems that this early design decision still has an impact today.

    Early home computers often were connected to the TV, so naturally they used this coordinate system. I guess a lot of monitors worked the same way simply because the manufacturers could partly recycle electronics/logic. And since this was then the “natural” coordinate system which programmers used (remember, we had to access the video system on a much lower level back then) it simply stuck as most people were used to it.

    The exception to this model is PostScript and it successor, PDF. They model a paper and therefor weren’t tied to use the screen’s coordinate system for efficiency. They use (0,0) in the lower left, like mathematicians usually do. The NeXT used a video system called Display PostScript which is an extension to PostScript for drawing on-screen and thus used PostScripts system with (0,0) in the lower left. Todays Mac OS X derived from NeXT and thus also uses this system. On iOS, the Apple engineers decided to flip the system to the more common model with (0,0) in the upper left to make it easier for developers migrating from others systems.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

While inspecting a non-functioning bit of code, I realized that I'd left the case
Having a bit of trouble using the List.Find with a custom predicate i have
I find myself using hash arguments to constructors quite a bit, especially when writing
How to find first non-repeating element in an array. Provided that you can only
In Chrome (I am using version 16.0.912.75 m on Win 7) I find that
Suppose I want to find 2nd bit in binary equivalent of 13 (binary :
I'm trying to find out a little bit more about how the preprocessor works
I'm a bit surprised to find the results of the following code, where I
after a bit of searching I was unable to find a helpful post so...
I was googling a bit but coudn't find anything usefull. Let's say I have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.