Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7686753
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T19:33:04+00:00 2026-05-31T19:33:04+00:00

I find it surprising that Ruby symbols can be typecasted to integers without errors.

  • 0

I find it surprising that Ruby symbols can be typecasted to integers without errors.
So :a.to_i is legal. I was wondering what is the significance of this integer, is it a unique value specific to that symbol?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T19:33:05+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 7:33 pm

    You shouldn’t do this, as Symbol#to_i was removed in Ruby 1.9 and is thus not compatible going forward. Regardless, the docs say this about it:

    Returns an integer that is unique for each symbol within a particular execution of a program.

    It is roughly equivalent to calling object_id on the symbol, as they both end up calling the C function SYM2ID().

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find it surprising that this has not been asked yet, so I am
It's surprising how difficult it is to find a simple, concise answer to this
I'm trying to find about ALL the possible options that I can set in
I think my question is easy. However it is surprising that I couldn't find
Surprisingly I was only able to find one previous question on SO about this
I find that getting Unicode support in my cross-platform apps a real pain in
We're looking for a solution that will allow us to use HTTPS without encryption.
This is more out of curiosity than anything else, as I'm failing to find
I searched, but surprisingly couldn't find an answer. I have a long NSString that
I searched for this here and on google and surprisingly couldn't find an answer.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.