Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7178297
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T16:53:36+00:00 2026-05-28T16:53:36+00:00

I find myself lacking knowledge around the below. Take this class: public class MyClass

  • 0

I find myself lacking knowledge around the below.

Take this class:

public class MyClass
{
    public var width:int = 10;
    public var height:int = 10;

    public function MyClass(width:int, height:int)
    {
        trace(width, height);
    }
}

The output will always be the supplied values for width and height, rather than the width and height properties that belong to MyClass. You will never receive an error for the above, either, even though it seems like there should be one for conflicting property names.

Why/how does this work? Also, are the width and height defined above my constructor still somehow accessible within my constructor?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T16:53:37+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 4:53 pm

    It works, because the parameter names “shadow” the field variable names, i.e. the compiler assumes you meant those.

    You can access the members by using this.width and this.height. This is also the de facto syntax the compiler converts all implicit member calls to in byte code (if there were no local variable of the same name, width would automatically be translated to this.width).

    BTW some IDEs, like FDT, allow you to set a warning or error message for name shadowing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find myself writing this code a lot: private int _operationalPlan; public int OperationalPlan
I find myself writing code that looks like this a lot: set<int> affected_items; while
I find myself doing this repeatedy. $jq(button).filter(function(){ return this.id.match(/^user_(\d+)_edit$/); }).click(function(){ var matches = this.id.match(/^user_(\d+)_edit$/);
I find myself writing this class often in my python code when I need
I find myself writing delegates occasionally for really simple functions (take no arguments and
I find myself needing to store public key certificates, and a single private key
I find myself adding debugging print statements quite often -- stuff like this: print(a_variable_name:
I find myself writing code like this when I want to repeat some execution
I find myself breaking this pattern all the time. YAGNI - You Ain't Gonna
In my day-to-day work, I often find myself writing classes like in this simplified

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.