Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6816237
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T20:54:06+00:00 2026-05-26T20:54:06+00:00

I find myself needing to put guards like this: if hash[:foo] && hash[:foo][:bar] &&

  • 0

I find myself needing to put guards like this:

if hash[:foo] && hash[:foo][:bar] && hash[:foo][:bar][:baz] 
    puts hash[:foo][:bar][:baz]
end

I’d like to shorten this in some way; I know I can wrap in a begin/rescue block but that seems worse. Maybe something like:
ruby Hash include another hash, deep check

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T20:54:07+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 8:54 pm

    Something like:

    def follow_hash(hash, path)
      path.inject(hash) { |accum, el| accum && accum[el] }
    end
    
    value = follow_hash(hash, [:foo, :bar, :baz])
    puts value if value
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find myself writing code that looks like this a lot: set<int> affected_items; while
I find myself needing: var self = this; a lot within my javascript 'classes'.
I find myself needing to store public key certificates, and a single private key
I find myself needing to generate a checksum for a string of data, for
I often find myself needing reference to an object that is several objects away,
I find myself defining classes like: struct AngleSize { explicit AngleSize(double radians) : size(radians)
I find myself creating Converters often and would like to be able to: right-click
I find myself needing to call back into the JVM from arbitrary native threads
I always find myself needing to enclose a block of code in curly braces
When writing comments, I sometimes find myself needing to talk about a type (class,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.