Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1024141
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T11:44:06+00:00 2026-05-16T11:44:06+00:00

I find myself often needing addClassName and removeClassName functions for Element s. However, I

  • 0

I find myself often needing addClassName and removeClassName functions for Elements. However, I dare not to extend the native Element due to potential collisions. So, now I am wondering what to do.

I took a look at ExtJS, and it achieves this like:

var element = document.getElementById('...');
var elem = new Ext.Element(element);
elem.addClass('something');

I like the idea of not extending the native Element here, but I do not really like the idea of wrapping the element so hard over a custom object, because now I can’t do several things like setAttribute easily, for example:

var element = document.getElementById('...');
var elem = new Ext.Element(element);
elem.addClass('something');
elem.setAttribute('src', '...'); // Fails

However, I could do:

var element = document.getElementById('...');
element.setAttribute('src', '...');
var elem = new Ext.Element(element);
elem.addClass('something');

but to me this does not look really nice. It looks a bit complex instead.

Are there any other alternative ways I could use besides wrapping the element around my own object that offers me these cool methods?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T11:44:07+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 11:44 am

    Just check if there’s already an implementation defined. I’m pretty sure addClassName is not going to have a different signature than you have at the moment.

    if (!node.prototype.addClassName) {
        node.prototype.addClassName = function addClassName(name) {
            // your code
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.