Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 188075
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T15:56:22+00:00 2026-05-11T15:56:22+00:00

I find myself using the ResolveUrl function a lot in my aspx pages but

  • 0

I find myself using the ResolveUrl function a lot in my aspx pages but the resolved path is always relative. i would like to be able to have the rendered path start with the regular ‘http://localhost/myproject/‘

How can i achieve that without breaking any code in case i change the hierarchy of my files? Would it be inefficient to write a function and call it for every targeted link on the page?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T15:56:23+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:56 pm

    Never mind guys, I found some code online from a Rick Strahl post and it seems to be something i might use in my case! thanks for the help

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I find myself using PHP-like loops a lot in Ruby and it feels wrong
I find myself writing code that looks like this a lot: set<int> affected_items; while
I find myself using Resharper's convert to auto property refactoring a lot to remove
I find myself using a lot of nested maps, e.g a Map[Int, Map[String, Set[String]]],
I find myself using python for a lot of file management scripts as the
I often find myself using Integers to represent values in different spaces. For example...
Although using SQL FOR XML EXPLICIT is cumbersome, I find myself using it often.
While using Vim (at home and at work), I often find myself doing similar
I find myself defining classes like: struct AngleSize { explicit AngleSize(double radians) : size(radians)
I frequently find myself writing code like this: List<int> list = new List<int> {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.